🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I know dozens of clients who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.