🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to approve a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," said the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful online content suggests that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and fit for young users," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local level due to national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring guardian approval for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to copy this example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that governments around the world are no longer content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.